Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

No. 50: Part 2--I Believe

January 15th 2010 00:00
Knowing the Road


In Part 1, paragraph three, a listing of reasons why the world is in need of answers to our spiritual questions was given. One can query an Internet search engine for a simple look at drug/alcohol abuses, school dropout rates, religious affiliation attendance, crime, prison populations, mental health problems, dissatisfaction with political policies, and a break-down in civil courtesies, etc. If we do some of these searches, we can see the information begs an encore shout: “Houston, we have a problem!”


You might think that in a time wherein knowledge has increased in so many ways, we would all see the need for jumping on the learning train. One also might think that reason would be over-ruling emotion, and the average person could see through much of the hype, and desire to know more. But, this is not always true, for many people seem comfortable just riding the waves of life—no matter how choppy-- instead of building a stronger knowledge vessel--one that might not be tossed so badly in life.

One must be honest with one’s self. Do you know what you believe? A good way to practice and study your self is to ask others. You may try asking people what they believe. One reason could be that we are social creatures and like identifying with others. It is not only the political party supporters, and religious attendees, who fit this tag, but gang members and association affiliates do also. When questioned, there will usually be a quick, curt, reply intended to silence you, while saving face for the respondent. They will reply with something like: “Oh, I am a________,” (which may be the religious or political title for an affiliation.) By that reply, you are expected to know the creed, dogma or platform for an organization, and associate it with that person. When you delve further, you will either see the physical, and/or hear, the squirming. Continue onward and see the blood boiling in faces. It is rare you will be given ample time for fairness in a genuine discussion. Most people are too uncomfortable for it.


If you are fortunate enough, as I have been over the years, to continue the discussion, you will most always find people are still seeking answers, sometimes even to the most basic political and religious questions. Once you have established a non-threatening environment by your demeanor, some will express their uneasiness with much of what they have understood in the past.

Why do you think people, including you, react in these ways? One reason could be that we are social creatures and like identifying with others. It is not only the political party supporters, and religious attendees, who fit this tag, but gang members do also. Or, it could be that questioning ones belief system is like questioning why someone chose their house or neighborhood – it can be taken as a challenge to their individual choices, and thus their intelligence.

Another reason could be that much information is coming in too quickly, and many are in information overload. Until one has the time for assimilation of knowledge, dissonance can result, along with its accompanying discomfort. Sometimes, people may feel it is easier just to chunk it all, and rebel against those who push their views on them with too much too often. Young people are usually the first to react this way because they have too few reference points with which to begin. Occasionally, however, an older person will throw in the towel. This may be because, in his/her earlier years, the discomfort was never discharged by asking questions, and finding answers soon enough. This caused the discomfort to continue growing. Both the earlier and later forms of rebellion mentioned, usually prove to be destructive in several facets of life. See paragraph 3 of Part 1 again.

What about faith? I do agree with the Bible’s definition. There are, however, some things that could be considered: If faith brings you complete comfort and lack of troubling questions, then perhaps this is the route for you. If not, you may want to consider that “faith” can be an easy scapegoat for not questioning and satisfying your hunger for spiritual knowledge.

Earlier, I wrote that beliefs and opinions are based upon prior knowledge. If this is true, then you may ask: Do I have enough knowledge to explain my positions to myself? If the answer is no, then you would be well advised to get on the learning train and find out more about your “beliefs,” opinions and affiliations, while not fearing opposing views.

Truly examining our belief systems can be refreshing and rewarding. Knowing what we truly believe can lessen stress, develop creativity and add a sense of purpose to our lives. It is not only better for the individual, but for society at large.
_______________

Next, we will look at some modern information that has come to light. How will you assimilate it?

Please keep it between the lines.
26
Vote
   


No. 49: Part 1--Believing

January 12th 2010 21:29


Everyone has a belief system of some sort, whether they admit it or not. It may be all the way from believing nothing, and boasting of it, to positional extremism. Whether atheistic, religious, political, personal, or any other (you name it), we use our beliefs to seek comfort and equilibrium in our lives.

Knowledge is definitely increasing exponentially. As it does, often times it creates dissonance between formerly held beliefs and what we are now learning. Beliefs that may have satisfied peoples of former generations are now in many ways, confusing many of today.

People are hungry, and not just for physical nourishment, as tragic as this is.Often, secretly, we long for an understanding of how and why we exist. The evidence is everywhere – in our families, schools, churches, synagogues, mosques, temples, politics, gutters, drug misuses, suicides, and institutions throughout the world. This hunger knows no socio-economic exclusion. The highest celebrities, the lowest field hands, the poorest, the richest, and most in between, feel the need, and many people openly express dissatisfaction with many answers provided thus far.

We need to define and identify just what believing is first. So, let us take a look at some semantics that may lead us to a better understanding.

Although, anyone can write a dictionary, and anyone can label a book “Webster’s,” I will quote Webster’s New Twentieth Century dictionary as a guide to lead us along. Believe -- “1) To accept as the truth, 2) To expect or hope for with confidence, 3) To have confidence in a promise, or statement (from another), 4) To think or suppose, to hold views or opinions.”

One can say that he or she truly “believes,” when oftentimes, not much thought could have preceded such a personal “opinion.” An opinion, I think, we will agree, “… is not based on absolute certainty or absolute knowledge, but thought to be true.” Opinion has to be based upon prior knowledge.

Believing is ultimately based on gut feelings, intuitions, emotion, opinions, hunches, and/or hypotheses. They can be from a myriad of other things gleaned from prior observations, experiences, and knowledge. Some pass it off as just “faith.” The faith may be genuine and apply to some, but the word is often used as an expression for not wanting to delve into what they think is believed or why, simply because it makes one uncomfortable or fearful.

In order to really “believe,” we probably should first look at ways in which thoughts have been fed to us, then look at why we choose them, followed by whether or not these reasons are verifiable and valid. Otherwise, are we really believing or just following the pack?

Let us use the rather trite example of electricity – We do not see it pulsing through our house wiring, but—based on prior knowledge—we believe it will light our bulbs, turn on the toaster, etc. Most people do not need an understanding of physics or even E=IR theory, etc. to have an opinion that it will bring the expected result.

What other prior knowledge could influence us to believe in an idea, our origin, theology, purposes, goals, political persuasions and so forth? Our small list should include written and spoken words from trusted sources (i.e. teachers, authority figures, ancestors, family members, friends, peers, and political and religious leaders). We should also list other media sources such as television, film, radio, etc. Let us not forget some of the most important, but more subtle ones like advertising, (both overt and subliminal), music, song, chants, and other forms of symbolism in various art forms.

Long ago--thousands of years in fact--mankind learned to manipulate the beliefs of others as a means of control. Sociologically, it may have started with hunger-gatherers when one primitive man said to another: “Don’t eat the red fruit on that tree over there, ‘cause it will kill you.” The fear was placed into the other because the speaker only wanted the fruit for himself and family. This form of deception and manipulation has grown to the present. Although we may have begun with a small band of hunter-gatherers, the earth’s population has been growing steadily, and in need of more control as it grew in complexity. Without evolved controls on our beliefs, can you imagine the chaos of a planet with approx. six billion different belief systems? Four or five major belief groups are easier to project and control (with a smidgen of others) than attempting control of unlimited diverse religious and political ideas. Although no one should imply a conspiracy of modern religious thought control here, controls have evolved nevertheless.

To say that political figures have not been influential in growing belief systems for political and religious purposes is to show an ignorance of history. Some giants of history have used religious belief systems as a form of mind control from the dawn of civilization. The height of it was when whole cultures were taught that their most important political figures (the Pharaoh, king or emperor, for examples), were direct descendents from God and that their attendants should also be obeyed always. Earlier peoples were taught their leaders were superior to everyone else because “God” had established them to be.

Both political and religious leaders have used two of our strongest secondary drives (love and fear) as a means to keep the group cohesive and controlled. “If you do not believe,” they would say, “you will die.” If not, then torture might bring you to either recant or wish you were dead. We know that far too often, they carried out these threats when challenged. It is amazing how long a belief system can be fed as long as it is promulgated by the sword.

There are other emotional drives and triggers that should be named when looking for ways we are taught to believe a certain way, such as vanity and hatred. Vanity is used to urge us believing in a product from enhancing our appearances to “we are more pious than you,” or “our city/country or possessions are better than yours,” or it is better sticking with the crowd. Hatred is used to turn people against one another, such as when the Pope turned believers against the Templars or when Islamic fanatics fly planes into buildings.

We have known for eons that in order to keep the group cohesive and normative (in line), we could present a threat to constituents from outside the group. Leaders have used other religions and figures for this purpose, from simply opposing their thoughts to attacks and all-out war. There are whole volumes written on this and the possible villains named, some real – some perceived.

Stay alert, my friends! They all use these methods. Your local councilperson, your pastor, other religious leaders, and state and Federal legislators all use these secondary drives to feed beliefs to us. The irony is that many of them are unaware they are using them and for what purposes. Their intentions may be noble, but the end result is that we are not all always objective, but due to manipulations, we are mostly subjective--without even realizing it. This further creates the confusion and dissonance within us. An uneasiness develops and we see the results as described in paragraph three.

In Part 2, we will attempt a look at deeper reasons why society needs help spiritually. Later, we will take further looks at how modern, more updated, knowledge is available for the inquisitive. I will take no doctrinal approach, but will leave the conclusions to each reader.
Please keep it between the lines.
36
Vote
   


No. 48 -- Fear and Respect

November 30th 2009 22:29
Sharp curve


As a youngster, I recall hearing tales of people climbing onto their roofs to avoid rising waters, only to be greeted by large numbers of irritable snakes. If they were lucky enough, they had axes or shovels to deal with the creatures. If not, then it was back into the house or scream for bloody murder!
Four years ago--while experiencing the flooding of our home--several poisonous snakes crawled, and swam everywhere, even inside! As I recall, upon seeing one abruptly, three mental states arose. The first one was being startled. The second was fear. The third emotion was elicited once I had a second to ponder the situation. That was respect. The primitive “fight” or “flight” guided my actions and, I dealt with the situation from there. Maybe you and I go through the same processes in similar situations.
Eighty years ago, Walter Cannon was correct when he surmised that upon encountering stressful situations, animals will choose to stay and fight or will flee the situation. The stress can be caused by hate, anger, greed, envy, work, confusion and other things, but fear is often a prominent trigger for choosing one of the two responses.
Dictionary.com defines fear as: “A distressing emotion aroused by impending danger, evil, pain, etc., whether the threat is real or imagined; the feeling or condition of being afraid.” It also says that it is holding “awe and reverence as to God.” (With the exception of ministers referring to the fear of God--in the “awe and reverence” way, most people appear to feel fear by the first definition.)
Dictionary.com defines respect as: “deference to a right, privilege, privileged position, or someone or something considered to have certain rights or privileges; proper acceptance or courtesy; acknowledgment…” It has other definitions, including some similar to fear. (Most people seem to use respect in many ways, but one is to appreciate the others capabilities.)
I submit that in addition to Cannon’s “fight or flight,” we should add negotiation. When a parent, or other authority figure, admonishes a child, often the child will try negotiating the way out of punishment. He or she will hold the turf until the last second--attempting to avoid a physical altercation, acquiescence, or the shame of running away. Looking at life in general--from the office, the production line, or any interaction-- the negotiation option runs swiftly through our minds. Experience has taught us to appraise a situation before taking action. In a millisecond, we determine if we can “talk back” to the parent, the boss, teacher, or other authority figure, such as a policeperson or judge.

In that millisecond, racing through our thoughts (usually at the subconscious level) we consider power, wealth, status, and possible-future-consequences for choosing our options. If we negotiate, it is hoped the other will see our position and back down from perceived aggressive options, and understand the reason(s) for our choices and the course(s) taken. If we fight, we had better hold the bigger stick, as Teddy Roosevelt described it. The stick should be power perceived or power proven through our words and actions--both current and past. If we run, we should realize the other most often will define it as a weakness and crank up the aggression meter.
Negotiation has its place, but it cannot always be the option of choice. Many a school child learned firsthand that even negotiating can be taken as a weakness. The school bully was not interested in ideas, and reasons for choices, etc. He or she was interested in elevating the status at others expense. The secondary gain was in the reputation, which the bully wanted to clear the way for his or her own choices and paths.
National leaders throughout the planet could learn much if they would just take the time reflecting on their personal earlier formative years. There are times when fear and respect must be altered. Respect the abilities and fear the consequences. If it takes the bigger stick, then create it by learning, and making it mightier. Looking at Sparta, Rome, Germany, Iran, North Korea, we should be careful always choosing negotiation. History teaches us it is often taken as a weakness and the aggression meter only rises. This is why detente worked during the cold war.
Please keep it between the lines.
41
Vote
   


No. 47: U.S. Health Insurance Reform

November 1st 2009 23:55
Car sick


We all have our opinions. Some, like me, feel the need to express them. Others just remain silent. This is okay, but unless we get to the heart of the facts, we cannot make legitimate and informed decisions. We all should expose ourselves to facts and opinions from all sides. Just viewing and pondering reinforcements for our set positions will not help us learn and act


[ Click here to read more ]
42
Vote
   


No. 46: Hate Mail

October 5th 2009 16:23


In case you wondered if America is becoming less civil, compare this "Letter to the Editor," that appeared in a Florida newspaper, to one you may find in your attic


[ Click here to read more ]
41
Vote
   


No. 45: "Reset?" or "Capitulation?"

September 24th 2009 16:42


Once in a while a really good email comes our way. Today, I got such an email and just had to share it. The writer is Stan French, who is very insightful.. So,. with his permission, it is posted here for you


[ Click here to read more ]
43
Vote
   


No. 44: Insurance From an Agent's View

September 11th 2009 21:31
Not to crash


The American president appears to be driving a deeper wedge between the public consumers and their private insurance protection companies. Many people already have a sordid view of all persons associated with insurance because of negative personal experience with questioned or denied claims, and rising premiums. Some may also have had poor encounters with office personnel or agent misbehaviors—whether real or perceived. For every one negative encounter, however, there are many more who boast of their service, and happily recount the times when having insurance coverage “saved the day” for them. So, in fairness, let us take a look at the other side—the insurance side—while deciding if the president is correct in his accusations or not


[ Click here to read more ]
39
Vote
   


No. 43: Media Flashing

August 5th 2009 19:11
Headlight fatigue


Have you ever been on the road for several hours, going into the night, when your eyes began to itch, ache or start an overall rebellion? They are tired--tired from the bright sunlight flashing through the roadside trees and buildings, tired from facing west with the visor pulled down for protection, and tired from the oncoming headlights--especially the ones from the self-centered who refuse to dim them upon approach


[ Click here to read more ]
40
Vote
   


No. 42: Watch Your Bill

July 22nd 2009 18:48
How much?


You can identify with this: "What?--How dare them?--those thieves!!" You open up your utility, phone, credit card, or installation bill, only to suffer from STICKER SHOCK. Am I "preaching to the choir" to vent some frustration here? I just have to get some things out. Here we go


[ Click here to read more ]
46
Vote
   


No. 41: Fat, Salt and Sugar...

July 16th 2009 04:04
Where Is The Food?


Back when I was growing up in the early 1950’s, even a child, just a bit overweight, was criticized by schoolmates and left on the sidelines for most activities. He or she was the last one selected for team sports, and the last one chosen as a dance partner. These children were often shunned. Most of the time, they were left sitting alone. Some of them developed normally, while some never got over how others treated them. Once in a great while, one of them would revolt and become a formidable opponent (due to size), if angered too much. Over fifty years have passed while things have only gotten worse by the degree of weight gain, and by the population statistics


[ Click here to read more ]
45
Vote
   


More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
50 Posts dating from July 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Edward Allen's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Edward Allen
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]