Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Sites | Writers | Advertise | My Orble | Login

No. 14: Better Written Communication

September 2nd 2008 17:50
Highway to Sanity
Just a little detailing


An English major or instructor may wish to comment on this post, since I never claim to be an expert.

There are some very obvious differences between the British and American word usages. Many we recognize right away, such as when the Brits, and some former colonists, use the letter u where the U.S. differs. For instance, words like "favour," and "labour," etc.


For punctuation, the American style books encourage ALL commas and periods be placed inside quotes. The Europeans may set off quoted words with periods and commas outside, depending on the sentence structure.

British people take certain prefixes more literally, and perhaps more correctly. (Hyphens will be used to highlight the differences.) They will say, and write, the words "pro-ject" all the time, whereas the Americans have chosen to divide the words more definitively and as they sound in the U.S. "Pro-ject" is a verb. "Proj-ect" is a noun. The islanders may say and write "pro-duct," in each case. The Americans will say "prod-uct" and divide the word accordingly in written form. This difference is common when the prefix "pro" is used with other words.

Americans may have noticed when typing an email message, that one-half of the quotation marks has been removed. I suspect the international gatekeepers have done this for simplicity. After all, it is helpful not having to hit the cap key just to begin and end quotations.

It is my understanding this is more of a British way. It is definitely not in the Chicago Tribune or New York Times style books to use single quotation marks where double quotes should be used. American convention commands we use single quotation marks only for quotes within quotes.

Speaking of quotation marks, I recall, back in the 70s (a single quotation mark can be used here), when hot metal typesetting was being replaced with photo composition, there were not enough keys allowed for single quotation marks on some machines and with some typefaces. People were forced to use the single opening quotation mark for what should have been used by a single closing quotation mark.This can work with a sans serif font (one with curves), but will make a writer look inept when using it with fonts that have a serif. When writing, we should pay close attention to this detail for dates. (i.e. '08.) Auto dealers often make this mistake in their advertisements! Convention sign and banners make this boo boo as well. I have even seen this error made with contractions like "don't." Good writers stay alerted and avoid this mistake.

What about "its" and "it's"? This is a very common mistake today. "Its" should be used to express possession. "It's" means "it is." The two should never be confused.

People have often forgotten when a "prime" should be used. Never use a font with serifs for mathematical use. Inches and feet should not have little curvy marks (serifs). Primes are properly used. It usually requires a sans serif font to distinguish between a prime and a single closing quote.

Around the time photo composition arrived, the women's liberation movement was gaining momentum in the U.S. Women's groups shouted that the use of masculine pronouns as a simplified way to express humanity was "sexist." It quickly became politically incorrect to write such things as "everyone thought his method was correct," or "each person should have his own ideas." You know where I am headed here. People starting writing, and saying, "Everyone thought their method was correct,' and so forth.

A fine writer will make every effort to avoid this trap. If the content is particularly long, we have all seen authors prefacing their work with a disclaimer stating their preference for the masculine style, and that it includes all women where it applies.

If one can avoid making the first-person-singular/second- person-plural errors by using "the" instead of "them" or "they," one should take the time. Should this not be possible, he/she, him/her is preferred by better writers, if it does not become overly cumbersome.

For other grammatical hints, any English textbook should suffice. I have just tried exposing some of the more common errors.

Keep it between the lines...











73
Vote
Add To: del.icio.us Digg Furl Spurl.net StumbleUpon Yahoo


   
Subscribe to this blog 


Just this blog This blog and DailyOrble (recommended)

   

   


Add A Comment

To create a fully formatted comment please click here.


CLICK HERE TO LOGIN | CLICK HERE TO REGISTER

Name or Orble Tag
Home Page (optional)
Comments
Bold Italic Underline Strikethrough Separator Left Center Right Separator Quote Insert Link Insert Email
Notify me of replies
Notify extra people about this comment
Is this a private comment?
List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this comment


One per line max of 30

List the Email Addresses or Orble Tags of the people you would like to be notified about this private comment thread. Only the people in this list will be able to see or reply to your comment.


One per line max of 30

Your Name
(for the email going out to the above list, it can be different to your Orble Tag)
Your Email Address
(optional)
(required for reply notification)
Submit
More Posts
2 Posts
2 Posts
1 Posts
50 Posts dating from July 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:
0

Edward Allen's Blogs

I have no other blogs :(
Moderated by Edward Allen
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]